“Release the Kraken!”
Welcome to the new PUA Archives feature:
The Archive: Comments.
Now, even after a post has been removed from the live mASF Forum & placed into The PUA Archives, fresh comments are able to be added by any registered member of mASF. The posts are not limited to just a thread, but every post (even posts which are replies in a larger thread). This means that every post in the archive, no matter how deeply buried in a larger thread, has the potential to be revived and become a new/live discussion topic.
To support this feature, it’s been established at it’s own host site, archives.fastseduction.com (you’ll notice this in the URL field of your browser) and is fully integrated with The PUA Archives itself. That means when searching or browsing the archives, the option to add a new comment is embedded there and also means any comments added here will be visible there. Posts are automatically synchronized and ONLY posts which have been commented on will appear here. Any posts which are synchronized here which don’t get commented on within 48 hours will get flushed (but of course will remain in the actual archives).
The key features are:
- Comments can be added to any post in The PUA Archives
- Comment feature is limited to mASF members only (no anonymous trolls/spam)
- Synchronized with the archives, comments made here appear there
- Integrated with the main Fast Seduction login, newly added in 2010, powered by Community Connector (a proprietary technology of FastSeduction.com launched in 2007) – that means no separate login required
- Comments are visually threaded here (for ease of conversation tracking), in the archives the comments are linear (may get changed later but for now the purpose is simplification depending on context, to avoid people confusing comments in the archives from being related to the actual THREAD context of a post being viewed directly in the archives).
- All proper citing is provided in all posts synchronized & commented on here, so that you can find links to the original post, board it belonged to, and other posts in the archive by the author. You’ll even be able to see which mASF member is the one who revived the post for commenting!
- When posts get synchronized here, tags are also dynamically (but intelligently) determined so that it becomes easier to find inter-related posts based on topics or specific sets of words, which is all integrated into the search especially optimized for this site.
It doesn’t stop there. There is the opportunity in the future to add additional enhancements such as more organized guides, tying mASF avatar pictures to the original posters, tag clouds, related posts pre-suggested, etc.
In a way, it’s like a “Cache of the PUA Titans”! ;)
Enjoy…
--
Jay Valens / “Form” <formhandle@fastseduction.com>
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
Keep up with me: twitter.com/jayvalens
Re: Mystery?s 4-10 hours rule
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “razorjack” | Find recent posts by “razorjack” // This post revived by: “Scorpione”
Group: General
Author: razorjack
promiscuityrules wrote:
…..
> Hey RJ.
>
>I know from your archive posts
>you like to qualify her for
>what you’re after- you have
>your goal: passionate,
>adventurous girls, that like
>to travel, for mLTRs. Not
>sure if you still look for
>that.
Yes, I’ve tweaked this slightly but it’s still fairly valid.
>It seems like you’re saying
>that you read her before
>approaching
OK, just a quick comment. There are some things that I can read about a chick before I approach, and there are somethings that I can’t find out about her until after I’ve started interacting with her.
>and make an
>assessment of what she’s after
>and then adjust your goal to
>what you think hers might be?
Well with some girls I can read that they are after ONS or something just for the night. However it’s impossible for me to know that she is strictly looking for an LTR without actually talking to her.
>Or do you just have a
>steadfast goal when you go out
>and ONLY approach girls that
>you think would meet it?
This was what I first started doing when I joined this board. I’d have my goals for the night or what kind of relationship I was looking for.
However I approached ALL CHICKS THAT I FOUND ATTRACTIVE, NOT JUST THE ONES I THOUGHT WOULD MEET MY GOAL. This is important to remember.
I wasn’t as good at "reading" chicks before approaching, so alot of this was finding out what the chick was like after I approached and get her to conform to my goals.
>You see the difference?
>Giving her what she’s looking
>for versus finding someone who
>is looking for the same thing
>you are.
Yes, I understand what you are saying.
Several years ago, I had these 2 things mutually separated.
But nowadays, I’ve found a balance somewhere in between these two alternatives.
When I meet chicks today it’s not so much about me giving her what she’s looking for or trying to find a girl who wants what I want.
Instead, I push the interaction so that we both make slight adjustments/compromises and find some middle ground, but at the same time benefit from our differences.
Did that make any sense?
-Razorjack
"Why do we chase women instead of settling for one – like most of the other guys in the world? No clue. We are a unique class of guys. Maybe we got cut off too early from our mother’s milk – so we spend the rest of our lives looking for that same titty again." – Zan
Silence is Golden
Original Post | Original Thread | Beginners Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “Washington” | Find recent posts by “Washington” // This post revived by: “Washington”
Group: Beginners
Author: Washington
A good indicator to a girl on whether you’re a cool guy or a weirdo AFC is the "awkward" silence. You know, that period of time when there’s a prolonged silence in conversation?
I was waiting in line at a mexican fast food joint, and I noticed this couple sitting down, maybe a first date or something. The guy was a wreck: his back was slouched, he was smiling and giggling WAY too much, and even from 20 feet away I could feel that creepy/nervous vibe on him.
Anyway, so the guy will bring up a conversation, and the girl will respond, and as soon as there’s a silence in between the conversation, the guy begins tapping the table, playing with his utensils, looking around, shifting his body etc. Then he would bring up another topic, and the girl would engage, and so on.
Now this guy was a total wreck, but I bet a lot of you newbies dread that silent time. Maybe you don’t fidget as much, but you’re definitely thinking "okay, what next? What next? Cube? Palm reading? Breakdance on the floor?"
Chill out. because chicks have a sixth sense for nervousness. Rather, if you keep calm and KNOW that she’s attracted to you, you won’t have to do anything during that silence. Maybe she can bring something to the conversation. And if she doesn’t, then who cares? Maybe she’s shy. Maybe she’s tired. You know that you’re the man, so you don’t have to entertain her. Rather, you can reverse it and see how she reacts to that silence, and from that you can respond with conversation that is natural, and not the product of panic.
-Washington
Re: The Community is the exception: A lesson for us all
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “neuromancer” | Find recent posts by “neuromancer” // This post revived by: “Washington”
Group: General
Author: neuromancer
Yes, fantastic post and thread.
I can corroborate the issues about college. This stuff seems to be true especially in the higher-end colleges. The more academic and closer to ivy league universities are, the less sex is going around. In the UK, Oxford is the most chaste university, followed by Cambridge at second place.
The same is true for grad school. I’m currently at grad school and although most people here are smart as hell, they are also unbelievably underdeveloped in social skills. Or at least rather frigid.
I think the reason for that is not that people aren’t horny in those places (people are horny everywhere), it’s a combination of people being brainy, incapable of being in the now, happy with themselves and a massive, gargantuan EGO that prevents them from considering consulting boards like this one or from seeking self-improvement.
N
"The difference between seduction and rape is salesmanship." – Roy Herbert
I’m too fucking busy, and vice versa
Re: Options for Day2′s
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “gridlock” | Find recent posts by “gridlock” // This post revived by: “efua”
Group: General
Author: gridlock
[The message body of the original post was empty or unavailable.]
Re: Being Aggressive/Direct with Club PU
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “Chopan” | Find recent posts by “Chopan” // This post revived by: “zhap”
Group: General
Author: Chopan
JohnnyC69 wrote:
>Direct verbal is like when
>you’re having a conversation
>with a woman and you tell her
>something along the lines of,
>"oh my god…you’re making me
>so fucking hard right now,"
>then taking her hand and
>putting it on your cock.
Just to clear this up a bit…
Women are different. What one will respond very positively to, another will be horrified of. There is huge tendency on this board to think "woman" and throw them all into the same category. Then argue about why one thing worked and one didn’t. When I am in-field, I am instantly adjusting what I say and what I do based on who I am interacting with.
When you’ve done it enough, you will know if you can move her hand onto your cock just by walking up to her, or after a bit of conversation and sexual tension, or on day 2. You have to read the girl. This is critical. Trusting your instincts is important even if they fail you a few times. Instinct is 50% of skilled PU.
>If a beautiful and
>sexy woman turns you on, let
>her know how she makes you
>feel. Never be ashamed of it!
I agree… but to clarify again: if she is not attracted to you, your letting her know she turns you on will only make her run for the hills. She can be attracted to you after a good conversation, some good EC, some kino, her laughing. She can also be attracted to you without your having said a word…. it can be purely physical. A look from across the dance floor… But that attraction has to be there first.
Taking her hand and placing it on your cock will not create attraction on its own. Do not make this mistake. For those that don’t believe me, try going out and doing that to women who is not attracted to you and see what happens.
Re: my game: exposing prostitutes
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “fak_Et” | Find recent posts by “fak_Et” // This post revived by: “fak_Et”
Group: General
Author: fak_Et
I was thinking philosophically the other day and a similar thing just clicked. Women who use guys for dinner and to buy them stuff in exchange for sex or a relationship are no different than prostitutes…. Coincidentally, my mom brought up the topic soon after in a casual conversation on the phone: "have you taken any girls to dinner lately?" and I told her my philosophy and she was terrorized, quite funny.
I do agree with you on that part but the rest of your post seems whack. You don’t give any examples of what you mean and no field reports or anything.
Re: my game: exposing prostitutes
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “fak_Et” | Find recent posts by “fak_Et” // This post revived by: “fak_Et”
Group: General
Author: fak_Et
I was thinking philosophically the other day and a similar thing just clicked. Women who use guys for dinner and to buy them stuff in exchange for sex or a relationship are no different than prostitutes…. Coincidentally, my mom brought up the topic soon after in a casual conversation on the phone: "have you taken any girls to dinner lately?" and I told her my philosophy and she was terrorized, quite funny.
I do agree with you on that part but the rest of your post seems whack. You don’t give any examples of what you mean and no field reports or anything.
Re: Archive Reading
Original Post | Original Thread | General Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “ware_ru” | Find recent posts by “ware_ru” // This post revived by: “ware_ru”
Group: General
Author: ware_ru
tyler durden archive, starting around file 7, 8, or 9 (I don’t remember) things start coming together (I think that’s when he moved into Project Hollywood). tyler durden, period. You will not get a better technical analysis of tactical game than from him, from anywhere. The guy’s fucking good
FR: Owning my world vibe
Original Post | Original Thread | Field Reports Archive | Full Archives | Search Archives
Find all posts by “M2” | Find recent posts by “M2” // This post revived by: “m2”
Group: Field Reports
Author: M2
Alright your forgiven but only because i went to bed early last night haha but sounds like a great time i can’t wait to get out there and sarge with you and zeus again its been far far far to long ![]()
Except for visitor-submitted comments, and unless otherwise stated or overriden by applicable law, the content of this article is Copyright© the original author with non-exclusive rights assigned to Learn The Skills Corp as per the Copyright Notice & Terms on FastSeduction.com. No further reproduction of any kind is allowed without explicit permission. Your access to this content is for personal use only.
